Being a party activist (the party organizer of the group in the ICP, a member of the Sokolniki RC of the CPSU(b) of Moscow), Voznesensky could not help but take part in the development of those resolutions mentioned at that time, which contained criticism of the "rubinschina". Apparently, he had to listen to lectures and reports by Rubin himself. It is important to note that, as a completely independent theorist, Voznesensky matured during that difficult period of Soviet history when Stalin won a decisive victory in the struggle for power, when there was a steep breakdown of the political and ideological structures of Soviet society and the command and administrative system was being formed at an accelerated pace, when, under the constant intense influence of a powerful ideological and propaganda apparatus, broad strata of workers, First of all, the party members believed that Stalin was the only worthy heir of V. I. Lenin, believed in his wisdom and infallibility. This "school" could not but leave a strong imprint on the cash and creativity of Voznechensky.



In the late 20s, being already in exile, L. D. Trotsky repeatedly called the graduates of the ICP "red professors of the Stalinist formation." This was told in his speech at the solemn meeting on December 1, 1931, dedicated to the 10th anniversary of the ICP, M. N. Pokrovsky: "...This is an extremely honorable name that everyone should be proud of." Voznesensky was also such a "red professor of the Stalinist formation", apparently proud of this "title".



The whole pathos of Voznesensky's article was aimed at contrasting Rubin with Marx. The author of the article used the fact that in the fifth book of the Archive of K. Marx and F. Engels", where Rubin's work criticized by Voznesensky, "Marx's Teaching on Production and Consumption", was published, for the first time, Marx's critical remarks on Adolf Wagner's book "The Manual of Political Economy" were also published. These remarks, which, as D. Ryazanov noted in the excellent preface to their publication, were Marx's last economic work, immediately attracted the attention of Soviet economists. At the end of 1930 — beginning of 1931, three articles devoted to this work of Marx appeared in various journals. The comparative characteristics of Marx and Rubin were contained, in particular, in the article by E. Pershman. However, in it such a characteristic is more fragmentary than in Voznesensky's article. "The work of I. Rubin deserves," wrote E. Pershman, "a special analysis, which, of course, cannot be given here." Such a "special analysis", although very brief, is presented in Voznesensky's article. In addition, much more attention is paid here to the methodological issues of political economy touched upon in these remarks by Marx. Онлайн казино Вавада. Ресурс Vavada Casino работает по лицензии Кюрасао https://vavadacasino.kz/ Только у нас актуальная ссылка на сайт. При регистрации новым пользователям бонус. 100 бесплатных вращений.